Elaborated on the basis of an ample documentary material, mostly unpublished, coming from over 40 archival funds, on the reports and comments of 60 periodicals, as well as on the data published in collections of documents, general and special works, this paper represents the fruit of the scientific preoccupations of documentation and research carried out between the years 1978-1982. Our contribution is not limited, in this way, only to the synthesis of the vast bibliography and to the objective interpretation of some complex problems, related to the political relations from the Habsburg Empire and between the nationalities from Transylvania. We have tried to present a point of view in the spirit of truth and respect, which also differs in terms of factual material, from research and works prepared with "crooked" in the last 10 years, by some historians, economists, journalists of Hungarian origin, establish, however, on all the western meridians. These so-called "patriots" try, on a wide and varied front, to present on all occasions and in the light of untruth, the problem of the living Hungarian nation in Transylvania today and its historical rights. The methods of incitement, which the propaganda of small circles of "specialists" of the problem, circulating, trying to "force the hand" of some bodies beyond their competence, are in flagrant contradiction with the spirit of the time. The Hungarian agitation in Western countries seeks in vain to achieve its goal: that public opinion, due to the insistence to which it is subjected, to get used to the Hungarian point of view, which in addition to relying on the truth, has long ceased to represents a politico-social criterion in Europe. Indeed, many epochs ago this way of seeing political and social relations - considered the source of injustice - worked even to justify and maintain a whole world of privileges. Today, however, if we want to make laws for the future from the mistakes of the past, it would mean laying the foundations of a new unjust society.
About this injustice and everything it would hide, I tried to analyze in the name and with respect for the truth, the historical reality of a short period (until 1870), when through abuse, Transylvania became a province of the young Hungarian national state.
To justify the claim to self-determination in Transylvania, some pseudo-historians claim that this historical province belonged to Hungary for a millennium.
This is how the millennium of Transylvania's "belonging" to Hungary - the affiliation of which the Hungarian historian A. Szilagy, in his work published in Budapest "Die Geschichte Siebenburgens" says: "well-known Hungarian historians have pointed out that Transylvania NEVER WELDED ”- represents 369 years of which over 300 as an autonomous voivodeship and principality (between 1200-1526, although the vassal of the Hungarian king, Transylvania had an obvious autonomy)
In the end, only 51 years remain (1867-1918) - which means 5% of the truth, from the much-trumpeted statement on all occasions in the light of untruth, about Hungary's historical rights over Transylvania.
It is unfortunate that these contemporary apologists ignore a series of indisputable truths, expressed in the constitutive features of the majority nation, of Transylvanian Romanians: community of language and culture, psychic and spiritual, territorial and economic community, solidarity in the struggle for social emancipation and national, as a result of the transformation of national consciousness into national consciousness.
We believe then that the work managed to highlight to a sufficient extent the harmful consequences of the dualistic pact between the Austrian and Hungarian political classes, when Transylvania was incorporated into Hungary, ignoring the will of the oldest population in these historical lands. The state policy promoted by the Hungarian political circles during the dualist period, was considered by the indictment against the injustices (Memorandum nn) as contrary to "the traditional political aspirations of the Romanian people and their interests of national existence, as opposed to and with the requirements of the constitutional organizations of modern states ”. Thus, the problem of the Romanians, as well as of other peoples in Austria-Hungary, became a European problem that had to be solved in 1918, when, on justice and morality, a "united and free Romania" was founded.
The present paper aims to analyze the struggle of oppressed nations to thwart the dualistic compromise of 1867, concluded between the Austrian and Hungarian ruling classes, which required the incorporation of Transylvania into Hungary.
The theme of the paper is a complex issue, which aims at the objective reconstruction of the historical process over an entire decade - the seventh of the nineteenth century - seeking the integration of this period in all political and social phenomena in Transylvania, Austria-Hungary and from Europe.
Presenting the events prior to the conclusion of the so-called "Ausgleich", we start from the idea of correlating the Romanian national movement with the political history of the Habsburg Empire and the national and social liberation movement of other nationalities in the monarchy, after establishing the dualist system.
The period of the "liberal regime" (1860-1867) that preceded the conclusion of the dualist pact, was, through the scope and depth of Romanian political actions, a milestone in the modern history of Transylvania.
The political turmoil of the historical period treated in this paper, especially the satisfaction of the demands of the Pasoptist programs, the transition from absolutism to liberalism, the debates and decisions of the Sibiu Diet of 1863-1864, participation in the Senate work in Vienna, the establishment of Austro-Hungarian dualism ( 1867), the laws voted in the Hungarian Parliament and the attitude of the nationalities in general and of the Romanians in Transylvania in particular towards dualism, formed through their genesis, development and consequences, the object of extensive research. Having as historical sources archival documents, the press of the time, private correspondence and specialized literature, this paper aims at a synthesis of political events and especially those related to the struggle for the national liberation of Romanians. The policy of national oppression and denationalization of the non-Hungarian population, practiced by the ruling classes in Austria-Hungary, harmed both Romanians and other nationalities in Transylvania, Banat, Crisana, Maramures and Bucovina, which resulted in their growing hostility. compared to the dualist state.
The existence of common interests in defending the mother tongue and other national values against the policy of forced assimilation, practiced by government circles in Pest, triggered numerous protests by Romanian, Serbian, Saxon and Ruthenian political leaders. A remarkable contribution in these common actions had during this period the Romanian nation in Transylvania, which fought for its assertion as a distinct nation, for freedom and for the right to dispose of its own fate. The cause of national unity was demonstrated and defended through cultural and political actions initiated by Romanian intellectuals on both sides of the Carpathians. The depth and importance of these cultural and political ties were noted in the years following the Union of the Romanian Principalities and then after the conquest of Romania's state independence. If the issue of full national unity has been a continuing concern, the conquest of independence has become a fundamental issue. Following the struggle of the Romanian nation in Transylvania for the defense of freedom, culture, mother tongue and the tendencies of union with Romania, we intended to make a contribution to the historiography of the problem, on which yesterday's historians leaned and continue to dedicate themselves with passion and responsibility. and today's historians.
The objective historiography thus demonstrates the indisputable justice of the nations' struggle for territorial-administrative autonomy and the constitution in their own entities, in unitary and independent national states. In their struggle for maintaining the autonomy of the Romanian territories and preventing the achievement of the dualist compromise, no doubt the Romanian bourgeoisie, with all its limitations, played an important role, acting in this turbulent period in the sense of the objective requirements of historical development. The political actions carried out on various fronts by the Romanian intellectuals - the spokesperson of the entire Romanian nation at this time - bear a progressive and democratic imprint. The Romanian bourgeoisie was convinced that the support of all social categories and the close relations with the other oppressed nations, will ensure the realization of their desires. Consequently, it can be said that the common struggle in which Romanians, Hungarians, Germans and Serbs participated alike contributed to the deepening of mutual respect, to the understanding of the need to harmonize the protest actions. The approached theme is so complex in facts and ideas, that the historian hardly resists the temptation of the unstoppable dimensioning of the exposition. We are convinced that such a comprehensive issue could not be exhausted in the research undertaken here, and subsequent works will elucidate new aspects of such a turbulent historical stage in the life of the Romanian people.