Manuscript proposals: [email protected] / 0745 204 115 //// Tracking orders Individuals / Sales: 0745 200 357 / Orders Legal entities: 0721 722 783
EN 
Romana
6359.png "Editura Universitară")
Logic. Baccalaureate. Complete guide - Valeriu Sofronie
![Logic. Baccalaureate. Complete guide - Valeriu Sofronie [1]](https://gomagcdn.ro/domains/editurauniversitara.ro/files/product/original/sofronie-valeriu_logica_bt-1-4834-2261.jpg "Logic. Baccalaureate. Complete guide - Valeriu Sofronie [1]")
ISBN: 978-606-28-1382-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5682/9786062813826
Publisher year: 2022
Edition: I
Pages: 204
Publisher: Editura Universitară
Author: Valeriu Sofronie
Product Code:
9786062813826
Do you need help?
0745 200 357
- Description
- Download (1)
- Authors
- Content
- More details
- Reviews (0)
Logic. Baccalaureate. Complete guide is addressed to the candidates for the Baccalaureate Exam, the discipline of Logic, communication and argumentation, to the teachers who teach Logic, to the ninth grade students who study it in class, as well as to all those interested in this discipline.
The book answers the following three questions:
1. What should I do? In this sense, the requirements of the Baccalaureate subjects in the Logic discipline are clearly presented and clarified. The author started from the principle that the one who has to solve a problem must know, first of all, what to expect.
2. What do I need to know? Once you understand what you have to do, follow the purchase of an informational baggage according to the requirements. For this purpose, the book offers a bunch of absolutely necessary and essential knowledge, accompanied by an explanatory dictionary of the terms that appear in the subject. In presenting the information, the graphic method (images, drawings) was used especially for their easy assimilation.
3. How do I apply what I know? It represents the most important part, the paper being designed so as to guide the student step by step in solving the requirements of each subject in writing the paper. In this sense, the reasoned solution of the Subject Model is presented, in an extended and reasoned form, as well as extensive solutions of the variants of subjects elaborated by the author, according to the model and the Baccalaureate subjects from the past years. At the end of the book, everyone will have the skills to write an excellent work evaluated by any proofreader.
The book answers the following three questions:
1. What should I do? In this sense, the requirements of the Baccalaureate subjects in the Logic discipline are clearly presented and clarified. The author started from the principle that the one who has to solve a problem must know, first of all, what to expect.
2. What do I need to know? Once you understand what you have to do, follow the purchase of an informational baggage according to the requirements. For this purpose, the book offers a bunch of absolutely necessary and essential knowledge, accompanied by an explanatory dictionary of the terms that appear in the subject. In presenting the information, the graphic method (images, drawings) was used especially for their easy assimilation.
3. How do I apply what I know? It represents the most important part, the paper being designed so as to guide the student step by step in solving the requirements of each subject in writing the paper. In this sense, the reasoned solution of the Subject Model is presented, in an extended and reasoned form, as well as extensive solutions of the variants of subjects elaborated by the author, according to the model and the Baccalaureate subjects from the past years. At the end of the book, everyone will have the skills to write an excellent work evaluated by any proofreader.
-
Logic. Baccalaureate. Complete guide
Download
VALERIU SOFRONIE
Professor gr. I at the "Gheorghe Sincai" National College in Bucharest
Graduate of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest
He has over 30 years of experience in teaching Logic, argumentation and communication in prestigious national high schools.
Author of didactic works: Preparation guide for Logic for the Baccalaureate Exam, Preparation Guide for Economics for the Baccalaureate Exam, collections of economics problems, collections of economics grid tests, Student's Notebook, etc.
Essayist (works of political philosophy), author and coordinator of some collective works dedicated to the work of Lucian Blaga
Professor gr. I at the "Gheorghe Sincai" National College in Bucharest
Graduate of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest
He has over 30 years of experience in teaching Logic, argumentation and communication in prestigious national high schools.
Author of didactic works: Preparation guide for Logic for the Baccalaureate Exam, Preparation Guide for Economics for the Baccalaureate Exam, collections of economics problems, collections of economics grid tests, Student's Notebook, etc.
Essayist (works of political philosophy), author and coordinator of some collective works dedicated to the work of Lucian Blaga
FOREWORD / (5)
Step by step through the requirements of the subject. Mini-dictionary of terms (6)
ARGUMENTED SOLVING OF UNDERGRADUATE SUBJECTS - 2022 / (33)
ARGUMENTED SOLVING OF UNDERGRADUATE SUBJECTS - 2021 / (49)
TESTS DEVELOPED BY BACHELOR'S MODEL - 2022. SOLVING PROPOSED SUBJECTS / (63)
TEST NO.1 / (64)
TEST NO.1. EXTENDED SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE AND ANSWER MODEL / (68)
TEST NO.2 / (78)
TEST NO.2. EXTENDED SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE AND ANSWER MODEL / (82)
TEST NO.3 / (93)
TEST NO.3. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (97)
TEST NO.4 / (104)
TEST NO.4. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (108)
TEST NO.5 / (116)
TEST NO.5. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (120)
TEST NO.6 / (127)
TEST NO.6. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (131)
TEST NO.7 / (138)
TEST NO.7. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (142)
TEST NO.8 / (149)
TEST NO.8. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (153)
TEST NO.9 / (160)
TEST NO.9. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (164)
TEST NO.10 / (171)
TEST NO.10. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (175)
Difficulties in applying the Venn diagram method for demonstrating the validity of syllogistic modes with valid universal premises and particular conclusion / (182)
ADDENDA / (192)
BIBLIOGRAPHY SOURCES / (203)
Step by step through the requirements of the subject. Mini-dictionary of terms (6)
ARGUMENTED SOLVING OF UNDERGRADUATE SUBJECTS - 2022 / (33)
ARGUMENTED SOLVING OF UNDERGRADUATE SUBJECTS - 2021 / (49)
TESTS DEVELOPED BY BACHELOR'S MODEL - 2022. SOLVING PROPOSED SUBJECTS / (63)
TEST NO.1 / (64)
TEST NO.1. EXTENDED SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE AND ANSWER MODEL / (68)
TEST NO.2 / (78)
TEST NO.2. EXTENDED SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE AND ANSWER MODEL / (82)
TEST NO.3 / (93)
TEST NO.3. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (97)
TEST NO.4 / (104)
TEST NO.4. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (108)
TEST NO.5 / (116)
TEST NO.5. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (120)
TEST NO.6 / (127)
TEST NO.6. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (131)
TEST NO.7 / (138)
TEST NO.7. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (142)
TEST NO.8 / (149)
TEST NO.8. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (153)
TEST NO.9 / (160)
TEST NO.9. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (164)
TEST NO.10 / (171)
TEST NO.10. SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE / (175)
Difficulties in applying the Venn diagram method for demonstrating the validity of syllogistic modes with valid universal premises and particular conclusion / (182)
ADDENDA / (192)
BIBLIOGRAPHY SOURCES / (203)
This is a practical guide.
As the definition of the term says, "practical" must mean something that is based on the "sense of reality" and "reality" here means the test at the Baccalaureate exam. There are two directions for moving away from reality on the market for these teaching products. The first, the most handy, is the excess of theory, without precise application purposes. Guides like this, at best, explain the theory in the textbook. But they do not really help the candidate, they only double the learning effort. At the end of it, he finds himself as shy, helpless as he was at the beginning, not knowing HOW to do what he is told to do. The second departure from the field reality of the exam is the guide with many tests, but with indications of solutions as brief as those found in the assessment scales from the subjects of the national exams. These do not help much either, not having a guiding role ‑ corrective. If he made a mistake, the candidate does not understand where he made a mistake; if he answered correctly, he doesn't know why he was correct!
So the third way was needed: from what is required to what I need to know to solve. That is why I resorted to theory only out of minimal necessities, leading fiecare each time to practical purposes: solving the test. I did not aim at theory as a theory, but at theory as a path to application. Moreover, I presented the theory in applicative ways.
In my activity for over 30 years at the department, I have met so many times that I believe that this question will not easily disappear from the classroom, with the questions: “HOW do I do it, professor? How do I solve it? How do I start? Is it okay what I did? Where did I go wrong and why is it wrong? ” Sometimes such questions confuse us, showing us the limits. Sometimes they make us better. History has shown, in a significant number of cases, that the safest and most economical way to learn is to accompany a practice until you become a part of it, until it becomes a part of you. Learning the logic for the baccalaureate exam is no exception to this rule of thumb.
I invite those who have chosen logic in their maturity exam to accompany me on the next journey.
The author
As the definition of the term says, "practical" must mean something that is based on the "sense of reality" and "reality" here means the test at the Baccalaureate exam. There are two directions for moving away from reality on the market for these teaching products. The first, the most handy, is the excess of theory, without precise application purposes. Guides like this, at best, explain the theory in the textbook. But they do not really help the candidate, they only double the learning effort. At the end of it, he finds himself as shy, helpless as he was at the beginning, not knowing HOW to do what he is told to do. The second departure from the field reality of the exam is the guide with many tests, but with indications of solutions as brief as those found in the assessment scales from the subjects of the national exams. These do not help much either, not having a guiding role ‑ corrective. If he made a mistake, the candidate does not understand where he made a mistake; if he answered correctly, he doesn't know why he was correct!
So the third way was needed: from what is required to what I need to know to solve. That is why I resorted to theory only out of minimal necessities, leading fiecare each time to practical purposes: solving the test. I did not aim at theory as a theory, but at theory as a path to application. Moreover, I presented the theory in applicative ways.
In my activity for over 30 years at the department, I have met so many times that I believe that this question will not easily disappear from the classroom, with the questions: “HOW do I do it, professor? How do I solve it? How do I start? Is it okay what I did? Where did I go wrong and why is it wrong? ” Sometimes such questions confuse us, showing us the limits. Sometimes they make us better. History has shown, in a significant number of cases, that the safest and most economical way to learn is to accompany a practice until you become a part of it, until it becomes a part of you. Learning the logic for the baccalaureate exam is no exception to this rule of thumb.
I invite those who have chosen logic in their maturity exam to accompany me on the next journey.
The author
If you want to express your opinion about this product you can add a review.
write a review
Similar products
Creative and recreational games - Otilia Clipa
Writing notebook for the preparatory class. Graphics. Letters. Digits
SEASONS: SUMMER. Logic-creative game book for 4-6 years - E. M. Katz
